Iowa:
•
Services, including telecommunications services, are sourced to where the benefit of the service is received.
•
Holding loans secured by real or tangible personal property in the state creates nexus.
•
Loan-backed securities are generally not “loans" that would create nexus.
•
Nexus for part of the taxable year is nexus for the entire taxable year.
Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies
The Department reviewed the statutory provisions enacted by
2009 Acts 2 and
28 and identified existing provisions of chapter Tax 2, Wisconsin Administrative Code, that no longer reflect current law or do not provide useful interpretation of the statutes as amended. The Department studied the laws and regulations of our neighboring states in addition to the model apportionment regulations developed by the Multistate Tax Commission (MTC) to determine how those states have been interpreting statutes that are similar to Wisconsin's. Also, since Michigan and Illinois just updated their apportionment rules for telecommunications companies (in 2008 and 2009, respectively), the Department contacted those states for insight on the industry reaction to those changes.
Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business
Nexus and apportionment issues apply only to businesses that are engaged in business in more than one state. Thus, this rule does not have a significant effect on small business.
Anticipated costs incurred by private sector
This rule does not result in a significant cost to the private sector.
Small Business Impact
This rule order does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small businesses.
Fiscal Estimate
This rule order makes various changes to Tax 2.39 through Tax 2.82 to:
1)
Update rules for apportionment and nexus to reflect statutory changes in
2009 Act 2 and
2009 Act 28 relating to the implementation of combined reporting for affiliated groups of corporations;
2)
Update rules on the sourcing of sales as well as definitions of certain terms to implement the streamlined sales tax statutory changes contained in
2009 Act 2; and
3)
Certain other changes to administrative rules under the authority of s.
71.04(8) and
71.25(10), Stats, related to railroads, financial organizations and public utilities.
The fiscal effects of the rule changes for items 1 and 2 above were included in the fiscal effects for
2009 Act 2 and
2009 Act 28. As such, these rule changes have no fiscal effect.
The fiscal effect of the rule changes promulgated under authority of s.
71.04 (8) and
71.25 (10), Stats., are expected to be minimal.
Agency Contact Person
Dale Kleven, Dept. of Revenue
Mail Stop 6-40
2135 Rimrock Road, PO Box 8933
Madison WI 53708-8933
Telephone: (608) 266-8253
Notice of Hearing
Revenue
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN That pursuant to ss.
71.255 (6) (b) 2. and
(c) 2.,
(7) (a), and
(11) and
227.24, Stats., the Department of Revenue will hold a public hearing to consider emergency rules to create sections
Tax 2.60 through
2.67, relating to combined reporting for corporation franchise and income tax purposes.
The emergency rule order:
•
reflects the changes in Wisconsin's franchise and income tax laws affected by
2009 Act 2, and
•
provides guidance to taxpayers and Department employees so they can properly apply the Wisconsin franchise and income tax laws.
Hearing Information
The hearing will be held:
Date and Time Location
February 25, 2010 Events Room
at 1:00 p.m. State Revenue Building
2135 Rimrock Road
Madison, Wisconsin
Handicap access is available at the hearing location.
Copies of Emergency Rule
A copy of the full text of the emergency rule order and the full fiscal estimate may be obtained at no cost by contacting the department. See Agency Contact Person listed below.
Submission of Written Comments
Interested persons are invited to appear at the hearing and may make an oral presentation. It is requested that written comments reflecting the oral presentation be given to the department at the hearing. Written comments may also be submitted to the contact person shown under Agency Contact Person listed below no later than March 4, 2010, and will be given the same consideration as testimony presented at the hearings.
Analysis Prepared by the Department of Revenue:
Statute interpreted
Statutory authority
General rulemaking authority in s.
227.24, Stats.; specific rulemaking authority granted in s.
71.255, Stats., as follows:
•
Section
71.255(6)(b)2. and
(c)2., Stats., relating to net business loss carryforwards, credits, and credit carryforwards.
•
Section
71.255(7)(a), Stats., relating to identifying the designated agent.
•
Section
71.255(11), relating to the adoption of federal treasury regulations so that transactions among combined group members are treated consistently with transactions among federal consolidated group members.
Explanation of agency authority
An agency may promulgate a rule as an emergency rule without complying with the notice, hearing, and publication requirements of the statutes if preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or welfare necessitates putting the rule into effect prior to the time it would take effect if the agency complied with the procedures.
Related statute or rule
Sections
71.24 (1),
(1m), and
(7),
71.29,
71.44 (1),
(1m), and
(3),
71.77,
71.82,
71.83, and
71.84, Stats.
Plain language analysis
This rule creates eight new rule sections. The purpose of each rule section is provided below:
Section Tax 2.60 Definitions Relating to Combined Reporting.
Provides
definitions relating to the other rule sections created by this rule order. Those other sections are ss.
Tax 2.61,
2.62,
2.63,
2.64,
2.65,
2.66, and
2.67.
•
Explains who must use combined reporting.
•
Provides rules for determining whether a corporation is a member of a “commonly controlled group."
•
Explains when a corporation's income is not subject to combination because of the degree of the corporation's activity outside the U.S. (“water's edge" rules).
•
Explains how to compute the combined group's combined unitary income, including the applicability of federal regulations that relate to consolidated groups. The following components of the computation are covered:
□ Intercompany transactions
□ Capital gains and losses
□ Charitable contributions
□ Dividends
□ Stock basis adjustments
□ Earnings and profits
□ Allocation of expenses and deductions
•
Explains how to apportion the combined unitary income and rules that apply to various aspects of the apportionment computation.
•
Provides rules for determining the taxable income of combined groups that are not subject to apportionment.
•
Describes how to apply net business loss carryforwards, including rules relating to the sharing of net business losses.
•
Describes how to apply credits, including rules relating to the sharing of research credits.
•
Explains the concept of a “unitary business" and its relationship to the concept of a “combined group."
•
Enumerates several characteristics that are indicators of a “unitary business."
•
Lists some key U.S. Supreme Court cases which provide further guidance on the extent to which a business enterprise is considered a “unitary business" under the U.S. Constitution. This is significant because the statute provides that “unitary business" shall be construed to the broadest extent permitted by the U.S. Constitution.
•
Provides several presumptions to aid taxpayers in determining whether a unitary business exists.
•
Provides specific rules relating to the inclusion of passive holding companies and pass-through entities in the unitary business.
Section Tax 2.63 Controlled Group Election.
•
Explains how to make the election and how to renew it after its 10-year duration.
•
Provides rules relating to the department's authority to disregard the election in cases where it has the primary effect of tax avoidance rather than its intended purpose of simplifying the determination of who must be included in the combined report.
Section Tax 2.64 Alternative Apportionment for Combined Groups Including Specialized Industries.
•
Specifies how and when a qualifying group may file a petition for alternative apportionment and what information must be submitted to the department.
•
Provides that once the department approves the alternative method, that same method must be used for a 7-year period, subject to a limitation that the tax computation under the alternative method cannot be lower than what it would have been if each corporation apportioned its income separately.
Section Tax 2.65 Designated Agent of Combined Group.
•
Explains how to identify which corporation is responsible to act on behalf of the combined group for matters relating to the combined return.
